Sample report. Invented people, invented figures - a demonstration, not a client's data. Xinnace Reports© 2026 Xinnace (Pty) Ltd. Not licensed for reuse.

CSAT

Customer Satisfaction

Prepared by
XINNACE
10%

Overview

Standing windows

Four standing windows, each against the equivalent period immediately before it. These ignore the period filter, so this row always answers "how are we doing now".

Against target

Unlike the row above, this counts the agents in the selection you have chosen, so it moves with the filters.

XINNACE Scorecard

Six consecutive periods: the first three set a baseline and the last three are scored one at a time, so the question is not only whether the target was met but whether performance is moving the right way. It always reads six consecutive periods, and the period filter chooses which six: the window ends at the period you have selected, so picking a month scores the six ending with it. It follows the department, manager and agent filters too.

How a period is scored
Target achievement takes priority — meeting it pays 2.5 whatever the trend

2.5 target achieved 1.5 missed, better than baseline and the period before 1 missed, better than one of them -2.5 missed, better than neither

Three scored periods, so the total runs -7.5 to 7.5. 5.0 and above is meeting or exceeding, above 0 is improving, 0 or below needs attention. Nobody reaches the top band on improvement alone: missing target three times caps the total at 4.5. Read the full methodology.

Trend

Satisfaction and response volume over time. Volume is shown separately rather than on a second axis, so neither scale distorts the other. These two charts always cover the whole file — click any point to filter everything below to that period, and click it again to go back. The selected period stays marked here so you can see what you are looking at.

Satisfaction over time
Responses received
Survey responses per period

Teams

Everything here follows the period chosen in the filters at the top, so you can look at a single month, week or day. The standing windows and the trend deliberately do not, which is what gives the chosen period something to be read against.

By department
Lowest first · against target
By manager
Lowest first · against target
How responses were rated

How agents are spread

Every agent in the current selection, ranked. The bands either end are the ones the slider sets, so widening it here widens who is listed for coaching below.

Every agent, ranked
★ Top band Middle ⚑ Bottom band Median Target

Coaching

AgentDepartmentManager CSATvs targetDetractors ResponsesLikely driverStatus

Consistently below standard

Agents
Ranked by how often, not by how far
AgentDepartmentWeeks below ShareCSATStatus

Every agent

The full table behind the charts. Click a heading to sort.

Every agent
Agent Department Manager CSAT Detractors Avg rating Response rate Responses Status

Commentary

Compare two periods

The same selection in both, so what changed is the figures and not who is in them. The page's own filters apply here too.

Source data

The files this report was built from, newest first

Version history

One version for each upload of new figures, and what it changed